Is Sexual Positivity Healthy?

In recent decades, sexual positivity has become a central concept in cultural, therapeutic, and political discourse. It is often presented as an antidote to repression, shame, and the well-documented harms caused by the historical denial of sexuality.

Yet a necessary question remains: is sexual positivity, in itself, a sign of health? To answer this, it is helpful to trace the path from the negation of sexuality through sexual positivity to its possible extremes, while carefully examining the effects on physical, psychological, and relational health.

What Sexual Negation Really Means

The negation of sexuality, meaning the belief that sexual desire and pleasure must be controlled, silenced, or morally devalued, has deep anthropological, sociological, and psychological roots.

• Anthropologically, it functioned as a means of controlling filiation, that is, certainty about parentage, and inheritance, the transmission of property, name, and social status.
  

• Sociologically, it supported order and hierarchies by regulating bodies to stabilize power structures and social roles. Culturally, it separated the body from moral value, associating desire with guilt, danger, or loss of control.
  

• Psychologically, it promised a reduction of anxiety through impulse control, creating the illusion that less desire would automatically mean less inner conflict.
  

This promise, however, comes with measurable health costs.

What Repression Does to the Body and Mind

Clinical psychology shows that repression, understood as an automatic and rigid attempt to block emotions and impulses perceived as unacceptable, does not eliminate desire but pushes it out of awareness through repression in the psychodynamic sense, often referred to as repression or repression via suppression, whereby threatening content is excluded from consciousness.

What is excluded does not disappear; it tends to return in the form of symptoms, meaning psychological or bodily signs of distress.

Contemporary research confirms that emotional and sexual inhibition is associated with chronic overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system, the branch of the autonomic nervous system responsible for alarm and stress responses.

This persistent activation is accompanied by elevated cortisol, the primary stress hormone, and reduced heart rate variability, an indicator of how flexibly the heart and nervous system adapt to changing demands.

These markers are linked to increased cardiovascular risk, systemic inflammation, sleep disturbances, and greater vulnerability to depression.

Psychosomatic Symptoms and Sexual Health Disorders

On a psychosomatic level, meaning in the interaction between mind and body, there is an increase in tension-type headaches related to chronic muscle contraction, functional gastrointestinal disorders in which the gut reacts to stress, chronic pelvic pain, and various sexual dysfunctions.

Studies by Masters and Johnson showed that sexual education shaped by guilt, silence, and fear increases the prevalence of conditions such as :

• Vaginismus (defensive, involuntarily pelvic floor contractions)

  
  

• Dyspareunia (pain during intercourse)

  
  

• Anorgasmia (persistent difficulty reaching orgasm)

  
  

• Psychogenic erectile dysfunction (performance disrupted by anxiety and stress)

These conditions often maintain cycles of anxiety and avoidance that, over time, further deteriorate overall health.

Sexual Positivity: Freedom or Illusion?

In response to this history of control and suppression, sexual positivity emerged as a cultural and clinical orientation that recognizes sexual desire as a vital human function rather than a mistake to be corrected.

Empirical findings indicate that when sexuality is integrated, meaning lived in connection with emotions, relationships, and personal values, it is associated with better emotional regulation, lower perceived stress, and greater life satisfaction.

However, a crucial disclaimer is necessary: sexual positivity, in itself, is not a reliable indicator of relational health, because neither the intensity nor the openness of sexual expression alone reveals the quality of emotional bonding.

Attachment Styles and Their Hidden Sexual Strategies

Research on attachment, the psychobiological system that regulates the need for safety and closeness in intimate relationships, clarifies this point.

Anxious Attachment Style

This style is characterized by a pronounced fear of abandonment and a strong need for reassurance. Sexuality can be used as a strategy of protest or clinging. In this case, sexual intimacy does not arise from a freely chosen, pleasure-oriented desire but serves to reduce separation anxiety.

Typical features:

• increased jealousy

• relational hypervigilance (constant monitoring for signs of rejection or distance)

• strong emotional fluctuations

• negative effects on self-esteem and mental health

Avoidant Attachment Style

Here, sexuality often becomes the only tolerable channel of contact. Physical closeness is permitted, while emotional and romantic intimacy is avoided in order to protect against dependence and vulnerability.

Typical associated patterns:

• affective dissociation (a separation between bodily experience and emotion)

• difficulties with mentalization (a reduced capacity to perceive and understand one’s own inner states and those of others)

• use of pleasure as a rapid stress regulator—without emotional integration

Studies show that both patterns can coexist with explicitly “sex-positive” narratives and high levels of sexual activity, while relational and psychological outcomes remain unfavorable.

Hypersexuality and Emotional Disconnection

At the opposite end of the spectrum lies clinical hypersexuality, defined as Compulsive Sexual Behavior Disorder.

This condition involves a persistent difficulty in controlling intense and repetitive sexual impulses that lead to significant distress or impairment in daily functioning. In this context, sex is used repetitively to dampen internal states such as emptiness, shame, or anxiety.

Neuroscientific research points to the involvement of dopaminergic reward circuits, which reinforce behaviors that provide immediate pleasure or relief, along with reduced effectiveness of prefrontal brain areas responsible for impulse inhibition, consequence evaluation, and conscious choice.

This configuration is associated with increased impulsivity, a higher risk of unprotected sexual behaviors, and elevated rates of anxiety and depression.

Clinically, there is often a history of relational trauma, meaning experiences of insecurity, neglect, or boundary violations within significant relationships, and insecure attachment. Over time, costs emerge for neuroendocrine balance, which coordinates nervous system and hormonal regulation, for sleep, and for relational stability.

The scientific literature cautions against new forms of moralization: high libido and intense sexuality are not pathologies in themselves. The widely accepted criterion for distinguishing health from suffering is agency, meaning the capacity to act as an agent of one’s own choices, to modulate desire, to say yes or no consciously, and to engage in sexuality without loss of control or harm to physical or psychological health.

Conclusion: Integration Over Ideology

In summary, repression and hypersexuality represent two opposite outcomes of the same underlying disconnection between body, emotion, and awareness. And the decisive point remains: even sexual positivity does not guarantee relational health if it is not supported by a sufficiently secure attachment.

Sexual health emerges when desire is felt in the body, regulated by the nervous system, consciously chosen, and embedded in an emotional bond capable of tolerating intimacy, mutual dependence, and vulnerability.

The initial question therefore requires a nuanced answer: sexual positivity can be healthy, but it is not healthy by default. It becomes a genuine resource for physical and psychological well-being only when it is neither a reaction against repression nor an ideological mask for insecurity, fear, or emotional disconnection.

The decisive factor is not how much sexuality is lived, nor how openly it is declared, but how deeply it is integrated into emotional regulation, bodily awareness, and attachment quality. It is in this integration, rather than in ideology alone, that the true health value of sexual positivity lies.

---

Key sources: 

Freud; Reich; Masters & Johnson; Foucault; Bancroft; WHO ICD-11; Kafka; Kleinplatz & Moser; Bowlby; Hazan & Shaver; Mikulincer & Shaver.

Critical note: the associations described are robust but always mediated by culture, gender, and individual life history; sexuality becomes a reliable indicator only when interpreted together with attachment patterns and emotional regulation.