Hypersensitive? causes, myths and remedies
- 18 hours ago
- 10 min read

The evolutionary function of the group’s sentinel animal
Inside a pack, a tribe, a small community, it wasn’t “the strongest” that survived, but the group that perceived first.
In that scenario, the hypersensitive animal had a precise role: detecting micro-signals that others missed, like a subtle shift in tone, a rustle out of rhythm, a light that felt too still, a new smell, a barely-there social tension.
If you reacted late, it could cost you; if you reacted early, you might alarm for nothing, but you stayed alive. This is one reason the human nervous system is so prone to hypervigilance: the social and physical environment has always been a matter of safety.
Even today, on a neurobiological level, relational signals like rejection, criticism, prolonged stares, or exclusion activate brain networks that partly overlap with physical pain networks, as if the brain treats social separation like a concrete risk.¹²
In Bodymind terms, this means the “animal” isn’t irrational: it’s a sophisticated radar for belonging and danger. The problem is that the modern world is a forest of continuous artificial stimuli, and the radar almost never finds a real pause. What was adaptive in a slow-rhythm village becomes costly in a city, at work, on public transport, on social media, with lights, sounds, and demands without interruption.
It’s not always pathology
Having low sensory thresholds is not automatically a disorder. It’s often a temperamental-neurobiological trait: some people are born more reactive, more “finely tuned.” It can even be a resource, because it increases aesthetic sensitivity, empathy, the ability to notice details, prudence, social intuition.
It becomes a problem when intensity exceeds recovery capacity, when exposure is prolonged, or when chronic stress and relational load are added: in that case the nervous system isn’t “sensing better,” it’s defending too often.
A practical criterion is this: if your sensitivity makes life richer and still manageable, it’s a trait. If it narrows your life (sleep, work, relationships, freedom of movement), it’s a signal worth taking seriously and understanding more deeply.
When it’s a symptom within clinical pictures
Sensory hypersensitivity often appears within certain conditions, but with different profiles. In neurodivergence it can be a stable part of functioning:
in ADHD and autism, for example, many studies describe sensory atypicalities across multiple domains (sensitivity, avoidance, but also seeking or low registration).³⁴
In stress- and trauma-related conditions it can emerge as hypervigilance and difficulty “filtering,” especially when the body stays in alert or freeze mode for a long time.
In chronic pain syndromes, particularly fibromyalgia, it’s common to find altered central processing of pain and stimuli, often described with concepts like central sensitization and nociplastic pain (pain arising from altered nociception not fully explained by tissue damage or classic neuropathy).⁵⁶
A critical note matters here: these models explain a good part of the phenomena, but they don’t close the conversation. In fibromyalgia, for instance, there are also alternative hypotheses and peripheral contributions (such as evidence of small fiber pathology in some subgroups), and the scientific community is still debating mechanisms and subtypes.⁷
This is useful to remember in a Bodymind frame: don’t reduce everything to “it’s in the brain,” but don’t reduce it to “it’s only in the muscle” either. It’s a system.
Types of hypersensitivity: it’s not all the same
Behind the word “hypersensitivity” there can be different mechanisms.
Intensity: the stimulus arrives “too strong.”
Unpredictability: tolerable if expected, intolerable if sudden.
Duration: not dramatic, but it never stops and the system tips into overload.
Integration: too many channels at once (noise plus lights plus smells plus people) overwhelm processing capacity.
Combination: often it’s a mix of several of these factors.
Which senses can be involved
It can involve one or more channels, and not necessarily all of them. Many people have an “islands” profile: hypersensitivity in some senses and, at the same time, hyposensitivity in others (for example, high sensitivity to noise and low perception of hunger or pain). This is common in neurodivergent profiles and, more broadly, in sensory processing differences described in the literature.⁴
Sense by sense: what happens and how to shield yourself
Hearing
Hypersensitive hearing suffers most with unpredictable, continuous, or layered sounds (many sources at once). The body reads sound as intrusion: muscle tone rises, irritability increases, the mind looks for exits.
The most common shielding is to physically reduce intensity using earplugs or noise-canceling headphones, and to reduce complexity by choosing “quieter” places and positions (farther from speakers, doors, kitchens, traffic). A trick that often works is replacing chaos with a stable, controllable sound (white noise, uniform sound), because it makes the system more predictable.
The Bodymind piece here is the pause: after a noisy environment, the nervous system needs decompression in silence or soft stimuli, otherwise it accumulates.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
filtered earplugs or noise-canceling headphones (passive or active) to lower intensity without total isolation;
choosing position and distance (back to a wall, away from speakers, doors, kitchens, traffic, more predictable “corners”);
using a stable, controllable sound (white noise, pink noise, uniform low-volume music) to replace chaos with predictability;
planning micro decompression breaks (2–5 minutes of silence, slow breathing, a short walk) right after exposure;
reducing layering (one auditory stream at a time: no TV on while talking, lower notifications, avoid places with too many simultaneous sound sources).
Vision
Hypersensitive vision is not only about bright light: often it’s contrast, flicker, constant movement in the visual field, or “visually busy” environments.
Protecting yourself here means lowering intensity and complexity. Light filters, lenses that reduce glare or blue light, a brimmed cap, warm and diffuse lighting at home, and reducing visual clutter in the workspace are typical strategies.
Micro-regulation also helps: alternating eye contact and gaze breaks, closing your eyes for a few seconds, looking at a stable point, reduces overload without cutting you off from the world.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
filters and lenses (anti-glare, blue-light filtering, mildly shielding lenses if helpful) to reduce intensity and contrast;
a brimmed cap or appropriate sunglasses in glare-heavy contexts;
„soft” lighting at home (warm, diffuse light, no flicker, reducing harsh neon/LED) to lower fatigue;
simplifying the visual environment (less clutter in the field of view, cleaner screens, dark mode if helpful, fewer stimuli in office/workspace);
intentional visual breaks (closing eyes for a few seconds, fixing a stable point, regular micro-breaks when using screens or being in crowded environments).
Touch
In tactile hypersensitivity, the problem is often light, sudden, or “uncertain” contact (brushing, seams, tags, rough materials).
Protection means making touch predictable and chosen. Soft fabrics, comfortable cuts, removing tags, friendly surfaces at home, and clear boundaries in interpersonal contact.
Paradoxically, many people tolerate deep, steady pressure better than light touch: that’s why weighted blankets or gentle containment can calm, because they give the body a stable signal.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
choosing “safe” fabrics and cuts (soft, breathable, without irritating seams) and removing tags;
creating a tactile-friendly home environment (sheets, towels, seating, contact surfaces that don’t “scratch” the system);
preferring clear, chosen contact (steady pressure, soft containment, self-hug, weighted blanket if tolerated) instead of uncertain brushing;
regulating temperature and transitions (layering clothing, avoiding sudden shifts, a warm-lukewarm shower as a “reset” when the body is alarmed);
explicit interpersonal touch boundaries (warning before touch, permission to say no, agreements on duration and intensity).
Smell and taste
Hypersensitive smell and taste can trigger nausea, headaches, irritation, and an actual urge to flee the environment.
Protection here is mostly environmental: reducing strong perfumes and harsh detergents, prioritizing well-ventilated spaces, avoiding places with persistent odors. Some people find it useful to have a very delicate, familiar “safety smell,” not to cover everything, but to anchor the system when an external smell becomes invasive.
With taste, the most effective strategy is respecting tolerable textures and temperatures: forcing often worsens things, while gentle gradualness expands the window of tolerance.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
reducing strong sources (perfumes, incense, aggressive deodorants, intense detergents) and choosing neutral products;
ventilation and “fresh air” (open windows, fan/purifier if helpful, using a hood/airflow while cooking) to reduce persistence;
situational protection when needed (mask, scarf, light barrier in critical places) without turning it into constant isolation;
a delicate, familiar olfactory anchor (minimal, personal, non-invasive) as a reference point when the outside becomes too much;
for taste, respecting tolerable textures and temperatures and using gentle gradualness (chosen micro-exposures, no forcing) to widen tolerance.
Vestibular sense
The vestibular system is about balance and movement: cars, metro, escalators, rides, rapid head movements. When it’s sensitive, the body loses trust in space and alarm rises.
Practical protection is to create stability: choose seats/positions with less sway, move your head more slowly, use clear support points, reduce sudden rotations.
Over time, gradual, controlled exposure (gentle, rhythmic, predictable movement) can train the system without throwing it into overload.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
choosing the most stable position in transport (near the center of the vehicle, seated, with clear supports, avoiding high-sway areas);
giving the brain a stable visual reference (looking at the horizon or a fixed point, reducing scrolling/reading while moving if it triggers you);
slowing transitions (slower head movements, pauses between rotations, avoiding sudden direction changes when you’re already loaded);
anti-overload basics before/during (light meals, hydration, fresh air, a brief slow-breath reset when alarm rises);
gradual, predictable exposure (rhythmic walking, gentle balance exercises, guided vestibular training if needed) to rebuild trust without shock.
Proprioception and interoception
Proprioception is your sense of the body in space; interoception is your sense of internal signals (heart, breathing, hunger, tension, nausea).
Here hypersensitivity can feel like “too much body”: a heartbeat felt as threat, a belly that becomes too present, tensions that turn into alarm.
Protection means stabilizing and making signals readable, with rhythm, slow breathing, and support points. BodyMind is central here: feet on the ground, back contact, low breathing, and regular sleep and eating routines reduce internal variability that the system reads as danger.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
simple, repeatable grounding (feet on the floor, weight distributed, back supported, hands on belly or chest as a “secure base”);
slow breathing with longer exhale (to lower alarm volume and make signals feel less threatening);
stable proprioceptive input (gentle pressure, light isometrics, slow stretching, “slow” yoga/pilates if tolerated) to give the body clear boundaries;
regular routines around sleep, meals, and stimulants (caffeine, sugar swings, alcohol) because internal variability often amplifies alarm;
turning signals into “information” rather than “threat” through gentle tracking (noticing, naming, normalizing, micro-pauses before reacting) and, if needed, guided interoceptive exposure work.
Stares: the social sense of vision
Stares are a special case: they’re visual, but also relational. A direct, prolonged gaze can activate exposure, judgment, invasion.
Evolutionarily, gaze is a high-importance signal: it can mean threat, desire, dominance, exclusion, or protective attention. That’s why, in hypersensitive people, gaze can become painful, not because “something is wrong,” but because the system treats it as vital information.¹²
Protecting yourself means modulating angle and duration: being slightly to the side, alternating eye contact and breaks, choosing positions where you’re not “at the center,” and, when possible, naming the need for less visually intense communication.
The five most common solutions in practice are:
choosing geometries that reduce exposure (sitting slightly angled rather than face-to-face, avoiding the center of the room, back protected by a wall or corner);
alternating eye contact and gaze breaks (looking between the eyes, glancing at a neutral point, returning—without disappearing);
modulating light on the face and intensity (mildly shielding glasses if helpful, lower-light environments when you’re already loaded);
naming the need when possible (“I need gaze breaks to listen better”) to turn threat into cooperation;
choosing more regulatable communication contexts (walking side-by-side, talking while doing something, settings where eye contact isn’t constantly the main channel).
Practical solutions: the point is not to avoid, but to dose
The best protection isn’t building a sterile life, but building a dosable life. The hypersensitive animal does well when it can choose intensity, duration, and recovery.
In everyday life this means designing micro-pauses, decompression after exposure, and simple tools (headphones, filters, fabrics, routines). And it also means recognizing the relational factor: the same noise or the same light weighs more when you’re under social stress, because the nervous system adds loads together.
Your personal hypersensitivity map
A very concrete Bodymind step is building a map. Not a theory about you, but a practical cartography.
Take each sensory channel and describe three things:
which stimuli activate you (intensity, unpredictability, duration, combinations),
which body signals show up first (jaw, stomach, breath, shoulders, irritability, mental escape),
which conditions protect you (time of day, distance, pauses, tools, people with whom you regulate better).
Then, right after, build your “list” of solutions as real choices:
for hearing which protections truly work,
for vision which filters or lighting,
for touch which materials and which boundaries,
for smell which environments,
for vestibular which stability strategies,
for interoception which body anchors.
If this map reduces stress and increases freedom, you’re moving in the right direction.
If, instead, sensitivity increases quickly, widespread pain appears, persistent insomnia, frequent overload crises, or a marked narrowing of daily life, it makes sense to seek a clinical evaluation: not to “medicalize” a trait, but to understand whether there’s a broader picture (neurodivergence, post-traumatic stress, nociplastic pain, fibromyalgia, or other factors) and which integrated interventions have the strongest evidence.³⁵⁶
Notes and sources
Eisenberger NI. (2012). The neural bases of social pain: evidence for shared representations with physical pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (PMC)
Kross E, et al. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. PNAS. (PNAS)
Jurek L, et al. (2025). Sensory Processing in Individuals With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (meta-analysis; differences across multiple sensory domains, including sensitivity). Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (ScienceDirect). (ScienceDirect)
Patil O, et al. (2023). Sensory Processing Differences in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder (review; sensory gating and modulation). Frontiers / PMC. (PMC)
International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). (2017/updated later). Definition of nociplastic pain: “pain that arises from altered nociception…”. (PubMed)
Boomershine CS. (2015). Fibromyalgia: the prototypical central sensitivity syndrome. Current Rheumatology Reviews. (PubMed)
IASP (2023). Critical discussion on fibromyalgia, central sensitization, and alternative hypotheses (scientific debate on mechanisms and subtypes). (iasp-pain.org)
Bodymind critical note and falsifiability: “central sensitization/nociplasticity” models and descriptions of sensory atypicalities explain many clinical patterns well, but they don’t predict everything for everyone: hypersensitivity is heterogeneous, changes with context and load, and in some conditions (like fibromyalgia) mechanisms may differ across subgroups. If an explanation doesn’t change your practical predictions (what triggers you, what calms you, what improves with a targeted intervention), then it needs updating, not defending.



Comments